SMART TASK Key Stage 4:
GCSE
SHP Medicine: 18th century surgery
This quick activity asks students to explore the detail in
Rowlandson’s cartoon called ‘Amputation’. They score one mark for
each of the 10 labelled examples of relevant detail and 3 marks each for
good inferences. If they can explain the purpose of the cartoon
they score an extra 5. First to 20 wins. Accompanying PowerPoint, supported by
teacher notes which give you all the detail you need to impress
even the most able students!
Ideas for milking the meaning from Rowlandson’s carton Amputation
There is a lot in this cartoon that students don’t spot on first
looking at it. The central image is clear enough, but some students need
to look at the peripheral detail. Why is this so important?
Well, students need to get into the habit of seeing cartoons, such as
this, as conveying the author’s opinion rather than a medium for
providing information. So every detail has been included for a
reason, and all link to the central purpose of the source. This
cartoon offers an uncompromising view of the surgeons’ practice and its
probable outcome.
Only by looking closely at the range of detail included can students
gain a clear understanding of the cartoonist’s, message and intention.
To make the activity of dissecting the cartoon a bit more fun, I get
the students in groups of 3 to see who can get to 20 marks first. They
gain 1 mark for every point spotted correctly, but 3 each for 10, 7 and
1. They get 5 if they get the significance of A. So you can
get to 20 by getting A (5), 10, 7, 1 (3 each) and just 6 others.
N.B. For A they need to go beyond pointing out that this is a
bowl to catch the blood as it pours out (1 point). The key point to bring out is
the fact that no tourniquet has been applied (4 points). This has
been omitted on purpose and is thereby passing very critical judgement
on the surgeon’s competence.
Below is a list of the sorts of points that could earn marks (in no
particular order other than as as spoken to me by a Y11 student
recently).
8. The victim, (sorry I mean patient) - is held by a strong
attendant.
6. His left leg is tied by a rope to the leg of a chair.
10. The surgeon is wearing protective sleeves (this would have been a
familiar image to 18th century readers and signifies a butcher at work).
Students can’t be expected to know this but they won’t forget it.
(Harder).
7. The leg the surgeon is cutting doesn’t seem to be particularly in
need of amputation. Note it is being bent quite powerfully by the
patient! (Harder).
1. The bag of surgeon’s tools clearly includes a large bone (a thigh
bone or femur from a previous operation carelessly left behind?)
The bag’s contents are spilled over the floor suggesting carelessness?
(Harder)
4. No concern is being shown for the patient. The man at the back
even uses the patient’s head for support so that he can get a better
look.
5. Guy to the right in tricorn hat and wig is wearing a sword. This
is a brutal operation.
11. The assistant is not really helping, other than holding a knife
for the next operation and a crutch for the patient’s use.
2. The surgery seems to be used for both dissecting dead bodies and
for operating. (Important)
3. You can see the skeleton’s almost moving in sympathy with the
patient!
9. To the top right is a list of surgeon’s names (provided on
PowerPoint slide 4) - can the students read any? They’ll be amused by
some of the names.
At that time, 1785, there was no form of anaesthetic or antiseptics,
but even so no form of sedation, e.g. opiates, is being used.
There is no tourniquet even. No-one shows any care for the patient. It
is as if he is just an animal being butchered. Even the list of
‘approved’ surgeons is poking fun at the dubious nature of the surgeon’s
art.
|